🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 884+ reviews
Vintageāœ“ In StockšŸ”„ Bestseller

Vintage sterling gem cuff links

ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…4.8 out of 5(884 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$32.58
$54.3
Sale
āœ“ on the house dispatch on this item • Limited time offer

Vintage gemstone pink toned, gorgeous accent to any dress up fit antique estate jewelry sterling silver hallmarks. Mens dress up jewelry

šŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
hasty Shipping
ā†©ļø
straightforward Returns

šŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage sterling gem cuff links

Vintage gemstone pink toned, elegant accent to any dress up fit antique estate jewelry sterling silver hallmarks. Mens dress up jewelry​

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

šŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 866175

Category: Vintage > Accessories > Cuff Links

Original Price:$54.3 USD

Sale Price:$32.58 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 dispatch & Returns

āœ“ on the house delivery on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Based on 884 reviews
RM
Robert Martinez āœ“ Verified
1 month ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Highly suggest Vintage sterling gem cuff links
Really happy with the Vintage sterling gem cuff links. Using it almost every day now.
NH
Nicole Harris āœ“ Verified
2 months ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Highly advise Vintage sterling gem cuff links
The Vintage sterling gem cuff links arrived in superb shape.
DA
David Anderson āœ“ Verified
2 weeks ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
Exactly What I Needed
Honestly, the Vintage sterling gem cuff links feels solid and I’m satisfied. No setup issues.
KC
Kayla Campbell āœ“ Verified
2 months ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
terrific Quality
it feels solid enough and it meets expectations.
DC
Daniel Clark āœ“ Verified
3 weeks ago
ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…ā˜…
delightful Quality
So far, the Vintage sterling gem cuff links performs as expected so no complaints. Packaging was basic.